There are many laws in India which are provided to women exclusively in order to empower them. Some of them are:
In our first post we will discuss, one of the most common issue for women in India . Dowry!! It is the leading cause of women’s death(murder) in India. In last three years there were 24,771 registered cases of dowry deaths in India. It is a shame for India where other trivial issues are given so much importance, but these psychopaths who kill there wives for money do not get any justice. It is high time that we give heed to this issue and do something about it. The mentality of Indians is that they accept anything that is happening to others and is common. We need to change this mentality. Now we are going to discuss the first act in this post.
The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961 ) for women
The legal system of India, Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code provides that:
“Where the demise of a lady is brought on by any blazes or real damage or happens generally than under ordinary circumstances inside of seven years of her marriage and it is demonstrated that soon before her passing she was subjected to brutality or badgering by her spouse or any relative of her spouse for, or regarding, any interest for dowry, such demise should be called “dowry death’, and such spouse or relative might be considered to have created her demise.
For the reasons of this sub-segment, “dowry” should have the same significance as in Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (28 of 1961).
(2) Whoever submits dowry demise should be rebuffed with detainment for a term which might not be under seven years but rather which might reach out to detainment forever.”
The crucial elements of Section 304-B of IPC are:
1. The demise of a lady ought to be brought about by blazes or real harm or generally than under typical circumstances
2. Such passing ought to have happened inside of seven years of her marriage
3. She more likely than not been subjected to brutality or badgering by her spouse or any relative of her spouse
4. Such brutality or provocation ought to be for or regarding interest for dowry and
5. Such brutality or provocation is appeared to have been allotted to the lady soon before her passing.
The offence of dowry demise has been embedded in the IPC as Section 304-B by the Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986. Area 304-B has been embedded with a perspective to control the developing barbarities against ladies, where a large number of young ladies were done to death because of inability to pay up the dowry requested.
The correction Act of 1986 has likewise made a few important alterations in the Criminal Procedure Code and the Evidence Act, with a specific end goal to make the arraignment of wrongdoers in instances of dowry passing more compelling.
Dowry is for the most part, what the wife gives the spouse because of marriage, and is a kind of gift made with a perspective to their future upkeep and backing.
According to Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, “dowry” implies any property or profitable security given or consented to be given either specifically or in a roundabout way, (a) by one gathering to a marriage to the next gathering to the marriage; or (b) by the folks of either gathering to a marriage or by whatever other individual to either gathering to the marriage or to some other individual at or before or at whatever time after the marriage regarding the marriage of the said gatherings, however does exclude dower or mahr on account of persons to whom the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) applies.
For the evacuation of questions, it is therefore proclaimed that any presents set aside a few minutes of a marriage to either gathering to the marriage as money, trimmings, garments or different articles, should not be regarded to be dowry inside of the significance of this segment, unless they are made as thought for the marriage of the said gatherings.
The expression ‘important security’ has the same significance in Section 30 of the Indian Penal Code.
Segment 113-B of Evidence Act, 1872, which was embedded by the Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986 states viewing assumption as to the dowry passing in this way, “when the inquiry is whether a man has conferred the dowry demise of a lady and it is demonstrated that soon before her demise such lady had been subjected by such individual to pitilessness or provocation for, or regarding, any interest for dowry, the court might assume that such individual had brought about the dowry demise.
For, the reasons of this segment, “dowry demise” should have the same significance as in Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code.
This assumption will emerge just when the arraignment has built up the essential component of interest for dowry. The starting weight lies on the arraignment to demonstrate the elements of Section 304-B, including the way that soon before her passing, she had been subjected by the blamed persons to pitilessness or badgering for, or regarding, any interest for dowry.
On the off chance that the arraignment succeeds in releasing this beginning weight, then decidedly the procurement of Section 113-B of the Evidence Act became possibly the most important factor and can be squeezed into administration for drawing the assumption against the denounced individual that he has brought about dowry demise.
The spouse and spouse’s relatives should be ventured to have brought on a ‘dowry passing’ and might be obligated for the offence unless it is demonstrated something else. That is to say, the weight of verification movements from the arraignment to the denounced, not at all like different offenses where the charged is attempted to be honest, unless it is demonstrated something else.
Segment 304-B does not clarify the term brutality. However Section 498-A, which was embedded by the Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986, discloses in the matter of what sums to “mercilessness” along these lines: “whoever, being the spouse or the relative of the spouse of a lady, subjects such lady to remorselessness should be rebuffed with detainment for a term which might stretch out to three years and might likewise be at risk to fine.
kindness which is the sign of human society is covered. Sensitivity to the more pleasant sex, the base sensitivity is not by any means appeared. The fixing which is taken out from its unique soil and planted in another soil to develop and bear natural products is smashed Sympathy is what is argued at our hands.
We are unmistakably on the feeling that it would be tragedy of equity if sensitivity is demonstrated when such unfeeling act is submitted. It is somewhat peculiar that the relative who herself is a lady ought to fall back on executing another lady. It is difficult to comprehend in the matter of why even the “mother” in her didn’t make her vibe.
It is deplorable that profound response ought to envelope her reason and suffocate her better sentiments. The dialect of prevention must talk in that it might be a cognizant suggestion to the general public. Undue sensitivity would be unsafe to the reason for equity. It might even undermine the trust in the adequacy of law.
The discipline for bringing on dowry demise is detainment for a term which might not be under seven years but rather which might reach out to detainment forever. In Dev Prasad v. Condition of U.P. [2002 Cr.LJ 4291], it was watched that while a normal homicide can be rebuffed by a capital punishment under Section 302 IPC, a dowry passing, which is a much more terrible offense has a greatest discipline of life detainment.
A standard homicide is carried out in an attack of fury or for property, however a dowry passing is not only a normal wrongdoing, it is a social wrongdoing. It offends the cutting edge inner voice and makes the entire of society return to primitive brutality. Thus, Court prescribed to Parliament to change the law and accommodate capital punishment in dowry passing cases.
The offence is cognizable, non-bailable, non-compoundable and triable by Court of Session.
We need to open our eyes to such cases as women in such issues are neither anti-national nor national. They are dead. Do not let political political practice of deception drive your focus from the issues that need your attention.